Cherry pick? Only one? Good heavens, I don't have time to do that. But your request is that of a well-meaning, open-minded, reasonable and intelligent person, and that sort of person I'll be happy to accomodate as best as I can at the moment. Any one of the hearings should be enough, so I'm semi-randomly choosing the Arizona hearing, mostly because it appears to still be fully intact on YouTube. So make your popcorn and pop open a couple bubblies. Here it is - all eleven hours of it:
The Georgia and Pennsylania hearings were more compelling, but it appears they've been "clipped" into so many short segments by so many sources I simply don't have the time today to look through all of them for the full-length video, if they're still there. (You know how out-of-context clips can be misused).
I watched as much as I could stand. I skipped through some things, including Giuliani's narrative speech at the beginning. I watched and listened to various testimonies. One thing is clear: there exists the possibility for voting machine manipulation. But I would fully expect that with technology.
I completely lost interest when Trump called up during the hearing and a phone was help to a microphone so he could address everyone in the room and spew some nonsense that had no place in a such a forum. He may as well have been giving a stump speech. What a ridiculous diversion.
I can fully understand how what was presented would be seen as evidence to anyone who already believed there had been wide spread and significant election fraud committed. However, that's not what I took away. Some of the accounts of people working as pole watchers and vote counters certainly brought into question some of the processes implemented in certain polling and vote counting locations. However, there was no one available to provide any answers to those questions. Which leaves each viewer to fill in the blanks for themselves.
Why would a green button need to be pushed on a vote counting machine for every vote? Perhaps that's how the machine works.
Why would Dominion employees be the ones actually running the counting machines? Perhaps because they're complicated and the amount of training required to run them correctly is substantial.
Why were there not both a Republican and a Democrat at every vote counting station? Maybe not enough Republicans volunteered in those Counties. And perhaps, in contrast, rural low population counties such as Apache with only 71K population couldn't find enough democrats to fill all the tables.
Why were "duplicate ballots" (as they are called) taken into a separate room? Perhaps to isolate them from the other ballots because they require additional attention or adjudication.
Why did the Dominion server kick up to 10 TBps from 7TBps when voting started? That all depends on why it was running at 7TBps before the polls opened.
Why were "duplicate ballots" being brought in from a separate facility where they were allegedly run through a high speed scanner first? Perhaps they were being copied to pdf for record keeping purposes, so that the data is digital available for scrutinization at some later date.
Why were computers reading signatures that didn't appear to match? Perhaps it was an attempt to verify, and those who cast those ballots were later contacted to be given an opportunity to coming in a prove it belonged to them.
Why did some poll watchers not have access to every aspect of the process or understand the entire process? Perhaps the volunteer position does not guarantee an all access pass and what they wanted to know was outside the scope of the position.
Etc, etc.
I'm not saying my answers to these questions are correct. I'm mearly suggesting that there are potentially quite simple and straight forward answers to the questions brought up by those who testified.
Bottom line: It sounds like the system isn't perfect. That's no big shock and we could probably say that about any State's system. However, I did not see anything I would consider to be evidence that significant or large scale voter fraud did actually take place. Though I thought some of the graphs and statistical analysis were pretty clever manipulation.