READ THE DATA. NUMBERS DON'T LIE. RESULTS AREN'T A PALLIATIVE
Numbers don't lie? Oh man!!
I did read the linked study, but a single meta-analysis is insufficient. I don't know if you understand statistical significance and scientific data, but it is easy to cherry-pick studies for a meta-analysis, because some will have a spurious result based on chance alone.
But none of this speaks to the issue of masks, which is a cheap and non-big pharma way to prevent the spread of the disease. Refusal to wear one in groups of people just because . . . 'FREEDOM' is the height of selfishness and irresponsibility.
I am no fan of big pharma (they are pretty much evil), but I doubt the presence of a big conspiracy here.
READ THE DATA. NUMBERS DON'T LIE. RESULTS AREN'T A PALLIATIVE.
If a cheap generic prevents deaths, why aren't we using it, is all I'm asking?
A mask is only a part of a complete strategy to defeat a pandemic. A vaccine is another part. Effective therapeutics are another part. Why is our country ignoring part of a complete strategy to focus on a part that doesn't do the whole job? I can only conclude there's more to the strategy than defeating the pandemic. Whether it's just dollars or whether it's politics and power or whether both I don't know and can't prove. But by just accepting a mask mandate as "the" solution without doing your own research and coming up with the same questions I came up with I just think that you're part of the problem. And anything that smacks of overreaching authoritarianism should be questioned regardless of its efficacy. That is what a free people would do when their freedoms are infringed. Temporary infringements for the "public good" tend to be difficult to roll back.
Thank you and good night all.
Numbers don't lie? Oh man!!
I did read the linked study, but a single meta-analysis is insufficient. I don't know if you understand statistical significance and scientific data, but it is easy to cherry-pick studies for a meta-analysis, because some will have a spurious result based on chance alone.
But none of this speaks to the issue of masks, which is a cheap and non-big pharma way to prevent the spread of the disease. Refusal to wear one in groups of people just because . . . 'FREEDOM' is the height of selfishness and irresponsibility.
I am no fan of big pharma (they are pretty much evil), but I doubt the presence of a big conspiracy here.