Ivy Mike
Member
Last edited:
Yeah okay. ??Tain't quite over yet as more fraudulent votes are found
How many have they found so far George? Who"s found them? And where exactly have they been found?Tain't quite over yet as more fraudulent votes are found
I guess is plausible that 10,000 dead folks revived themselves in Michigan in order to vote... right guys?How many have they found so far George? Who"s found them? And where exactly have they been found?
I guess is plausible that 10,000 dead folks revived themselves in Michigan in order to vote... right guys?
Or that the ballot counting system used has been identified as unreliable and flawed by people on both sides... or that any mistakes found this far (in Georgia particularly) seem to lean to one side of the party lines. Hmmm.
Most of the people now defending the integrity of the election system were the same ones who spent the last 4 years whining about Trump stating he wasn't their president and that Russians hacked the election. Hell, Biden seems to get along with the Russians just as well as Trump which I suppose is another subject.
Fair enough; I'm jumping to conclusions in who they voted for, and was overly sarcastic in my response. For that I apologize.I'll bite on that. Got a link?
I did just read today that some guys had attempted to vote fraudulently with 8000 ballots, somewhere in California. But it didn't say who those 8000 ballots were voting for. Evidently they got caught.
With recounts and suits in progress I'm curious to see what happens here. I have little trust in the media.
Sure, I voted for who I voted for and want that individual to win, but most of all I want a fair race. A fraudulent election swinging either way helps nobody.
Claimed lack of evidence. Sworn affidavits are considered as evidence under penalty of perjury, except in this election situation. Corrupt judges, corrupt voting machines.From all I've heard so far, lack (or rather absences) of evidence has resulted in many of Trump's election-based law suits being thrown out of court.
We certainly have in common a desire to see free and fair elections. I have no issue with recounts or any other legal measures being employed to acertain who truly won. What I do have an issue with is accusations and rumors that lack any substantive evidence. So I guess we'll have to wait and see what evidence can be produced.
I'll take a look at that article when I have time. Thanks for posting it.
The winter of our discontent, lasting for at least 4 years .I believe, even a month later now, that this is a case of “ There are none so blind as those who refuse to see”.
We could rub their noses in “it”, and they still wouldn’t smell it.
Bernie is out in force now. The “news” has all but ignored the election problems. And refuses to report on the civil unrest STILL in Seattle, a bastion of “Not-Solialism Social programs. Darth Whitmer has locked us down into next year, even as she states our Corvid numbers are better than our Great Lakes neighbors. Bill Barr is running to cover his behind, instead of putting Hunter or Joe’s behinds in jail. Polosi says $600 aught to cover this years wages, while giving millions of dollars to Pakistan.
My children will only know indoctrination, not education.
They will be saved from starving, but not allowed to work for more.
They will be given the shelter of the ghetto, but not allowed a home.
They will have to right to scream till they are blue, but not be heard.
And for most of the “loudest”, that’s just fine. As long as they extend the unemployment...
Joe Biden was right. It is going to be a dark winter indeed!
Are you referring to the sworn affidavit where someone claimed they heard two people saying some stuff? How did the judge take it? "Hearsay" was the word he used, wasn't it?Claimed lack of evidence. Sworn affidavits are considered as evidence under penalty of perjury, except in this election situation. Corrupt judges, corrupt voting machines.
Under penalty of perjury, and several hundred sworn affidavits? C'mon man!Are you referring to the sworn affidavit where someone claimed they heard two people saying some stuff? How did the judge take it? "Hearsay" was the word he used, wasn't it?
I haven't see the "evidence" so I can't really say what I'd make of it. But, a statement doesn't seem like terribly compelling evidence. Anyone can make up a story and swear that it's true.
Several hundred sworn afgidavits? Okay, I'm open to looking at that information. Do you have a link to the specifics?Under penalty of perjury, and several hundred sworn affidavits? C'mon man!
Look into hearings held in Michigan, Pennsylvania, GA, for a start.Several hundred sworn afgidavits? Okay, I'm open to looking at that information. Do you have a link to the specifics?
There's not a pro Trump website with all these sworn statements available for public viewing? As some sort of evidence to the people?Look into hearings held in Michigan, Pennsylvania, GA, for a start.
What we need to do is stay calm, anticipate that third parties will register and post seditious material to justify shutting this site down, and REPORT THEM IMMEDIATELY.
Again, I know it feels like the Republic is lost. It may be. But for now, on this site, please for the love of God stay calm, speak rationally, and hope for .... better judgement from our leaders in the future.
The coming days and weeks (likely after the 20th) will be easier, but for now we need to be on the best possible behavior. Please. :)