Mike Lindell's 'cyber-symposium' crashes, burns

roscoe

Well-known member
My god, I never thought it possible, but I feel a sliver of sympathy for him. He has been made a fool of so repeatedly, and grifted by so many people pumping the conspiracy, that I fear for his sanity as it all comes tumbling down:

 

wiscoaster

Well-known member
Well, I watched much of it and came away with a completely different take than the obviously biased articles linked above attempt to portray.

Lindell himself doesn't come across well because, well, that's just his nature. He's kind of rough around the edges and not at all a polished presenter (and not at all reticent about it). But his cyber expert Dr. Frank came across very well and very convincingly. The hard evidence is there. It's just so technical in nature that it's almost impossible to explain convincingly to someone who's not conversant in the technobabble used to express it. That would pretty much include all the so-called journalists trying to cover it. Of course, they're not going to be convinced. It's way over their heads even before their biases filter it.

And apparently you missed the whole point and purposes of the symposium, anyway. It wasn't to prove. It was to organize, network and motivate. And on those, I think it was a success. And we'll see what comes of that when all those legislators return to their home states....
 
Last edited:

roscoe

Well-known member
Well, I watched much of it and came away with a completely different take than the obviously biased articles linked above attempt to portray.

Lindell himself doesn't come across well because, well, that's just his nature, but his cyber expert Dr. Frank came across very well and very convincingly. The hard evidence is there. It's just so technical in nature that it's almost impossible to explain convincingly to someone who's not conversant in the technobabble used to express it. That would pretty much include all the so-called journalists trying to cover it. Of course, they're not going to be convinced. It's way over their heads.

And apparently you missed the whole point and purposes of the symposium. It wasn't to prove. It was to organize, network and motivate. And on those, I think it was a success.
His cyber-expert admitted that there was no evidence from the actual computer data, so it may have built excitement, but it falsified the idea that he has any actual proof of computer fraud. That, to my mind, makes it a rally built around a lie.

But if you look at the crowd in days 2 and 3, I think you will not regard it as a success, at least in terms of attendance.
 

wiscoaster

Well-known member
But if you look at the crowd in days 2 and 3, I think you will not regard it as a success, at least in terms of attendance.
Have you ever spent three days in Sioux Falls? I grew up near there and I can assure you a couple days in Sioux Falls and anybody from anywhere else is going to take the least excuse to bug outa there. It's got to rank right up near the top as the most boring city in the world. I think maybe by the end of day one they already got what they came there for and so why stick around? In other words: I wouldn't read too much into that observation.
 
Last edited:

roscoe

Well-known member
Have you ever spent three days in Sioux Falls? I grew up near there and I can assure you a couple days in Sioux Falls and anybody from anywhere else is going to take the least excuse to bug outa there. It's got to rank right up near the top as the most boring city in the world. I think maybe by the end of day one they already got what they came there for and so why stick around? In other words: I wouldn't read too much into that observation.
That may be. But Fox News, declined to cover it, apparently seeing it as a slow-moving train wreck. If Fox decides a right-wing conference is too kooky to cover, that says something.
 

wiscoaster

Well-known member
...But Fox News, declined to cover it....that says something....
Well, of course, Lindell cancelled all his ads on Fox. I don't suppose there was some tit-for-tat there, do you? What it says is that Fox is not a news organization.

CNN was there...they covered it - but did they report it? Of course not. To be expected.
 

roscoe

Well-known member
Well, of course, Lindell cancelled all his ads on Fox. I don't suppose there was some tit-for-tat there, do you? What it says is that Fox is not a news organization.

CNN was there...they covered it - but did they report it? Of course not. To be expected.
Well, CNN had people there commenting on it, and interviewed Lindell:


Like I said, a train wreck.
 
Last edited:

wiscoaster

Well-known member
I don't think he really cares what Mike Lindell says, so how about @roscoe = ((! Mike Lindell) && CNN)

Which since he thinks Mike Lindell is lying, means two lies make a truth.

Big Brother would approve!! (y)
 
Top