Nefarious purpose?The "evidence" from "the experts" is being spun in what appears to be a nefarious purpose.
Explain that, and then prove it. Because nothing of what you wrote past that sentence matters until you can elaborate on that and give you explanation some substance.
You can blah blah blah about counter evidence etc etc etc (and I notice no one is providing this "preponderance of evidence") but whilst you accuse the experts at the CDC (and wherever else) of acting shady or misleading us, there has to be a reason for them to do so. And I've yet to hear one that makes sense.