Executive Order Canceling the Constitution

NassauBob

New member
Last edited:

NassauBob

New member
Sec. 7. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 1 of this order.
 

NassauBob

New member
Nothing in this order shall prohibit transactions for the conduct of the official business of the Federal Government or the United Nations (including its specialized agencies, programs, funds, and related organizations) by employees, grantees, and contractors thereof.


Guess the UN & NGO's ok to participate in future elections
 
Last edited:

roscoe

Well-known member
Nothing in this order shall prohibit transactions for the conduct of the official business of the Federal Government or the United Nations (including its specialized agencies, programs, funds, and related organizations) by employees, grantees, and contractors thereof.


Guess the UN & NGO's ok to participate in future elections

So, to be precise - what do you think this order does? And in what way is it unconstitutional?
 

NassauBob

New member
Contrary to its title, this EO is not about Russia. It is designed to allow the Biden administration to deprive American citizens and organizations of their rights and property by arbitrarily linking those persons to real, imagined, or vaguely defined activities of the Russian government.


The Biden administration unilaterally makes the determination and requires neither criminal acts nor intent. The punishment is blocking assets and a prohibition on any dealing with the accused person. Spouses and adult children of individuals found guilty by accusation under this EO are punished, too.

The EO was preceded by some distracting maneuvers, both diplomatic (hostile rhetoric toward Russia) and military (sending naval ships toward the Black Sea and recalling them back, as if dealing with Russian threats). Thus, many people assumed that the EO was directed at Russia, and completely missed the fact that it is directed at dissent here, at home.

Over the past four years, the Democrat Party, Fake News, and Big Tech have been frequently portraying their opponents as Russian trolls or Russian misinformation operators. The Russian collusion narrative, initially invented to overthrow the Trump administration, has been used to smear many conservative movements. Now this effort has been crowned by an Executive Order.
 

roscoe

Well-known member
Contrary to its title, this EO is not about Russia. It is designed to allow the Biden administration to deprive American citizens and organizations of their rights and property by arbitrarily linking those persons to real, imagined, or vaguely defined activities of the Russian government.


The Biden administration unilaterally makes the determination and requires neither criminal acts nor intent. The punishment is blocking assets and a prohibition on any dealing with the accused person. Spouses and adult children of individuals found guilty by accusation under this EO are punished, too.

The EO was preceded by some distracting maneuvers, both diplomatic (hostile rhetoric toward Russia) and military (sending naval ships toward the Black Sea and recalling them back, as if dealing with Russian threats). Thus, many people assumed that the EO was directed at Russia, and completely missed the fact that it is directed at dissent here, at home.

Over the past four years, the Democrat Party, Fake News, and Big Tech have been frequently portraying their opponents as Russian trolls or Russian misinformation operators. The Russian collusion narrative, initially invented to overthrow the Trump administration, has been used to smear many conservative movements. Now this effort has been crowned by an Executive Order.

Well, until I see any one of the things you claim actually occur, I will hold back my trembling. In the meantime I will take it at face value, as an economic sanction against Russia. Which is what it is.
 

NassauBob

New member
Not asking anyone to tremble
Very few things resemble what they were for years past's face value
 

Attachments

  • 2VfBAwiE.png
    2VfBAwiE.png
    573 KB · Views: 13

wiscoaster

Well-known member
Biden has made some pretty disconcerting and worrisome statements about the Constitution, and I think freedom-loving citizens have every right to be concerned. I don't know, and I can't judge, whether his statements are due to his poor understanding of the Constitution, or whether they're due to his antipathy toward the Constitution. Either way, the end result could be the same.
 

roscoe

Well-known member
Soooooo...asset forfeiture?

Color me shocked.
That whole thing started under Reagan and the War on Drugs. And once government agencies saw they could keep prizes like old-time privateers, it really ran rampant. I mean, who ever heard of conflict of interest?

If you really want to see ground-level corruption, ask a police officer about what happens to confiscated property in the department property room.
 
Top