comparison of vaccinated adults with exposed adults - infection rate odds

roscoe

Well-known member
I will cut to the main point: "the adjusted odds of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 among unvaccinated adults with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were 5.49-fold higher than the odds among fully vaccinated recipients of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine"

 

Fine Figure of a Man

Well-known member
I'll cut to the point: everyone that wants to get a covid vax should do so and then move on with their life (after sending Donald Trump a thank you of course). I would hope that life is not centered around worrying about who else is or isn't vaccinated, boosted and masked.
 

roscoe

Well-known member
I'll cut to the point: everyone that wants to get a covid vax should do so and then move on with their life (after sending Donald Trump a thank you of course). I would hope that life is not centered around worrying about who else is or isn't vaccinated, boosted and masked.
I think you misspelled Fauci as 'Trump'.
 

theotherwaldo

Well-known member
We are supposed to thank Fauci for helping to create COVID?
He certainly has done little to ameliorate it besides spreading confusion and misinformation.
"Go party in Chinatown -no, just stay home - no masks - no, two masks - don't use ivermectin - now ivermectin's OK - don't use Trump's vaccines -must use Biden's vaccines (same stuff as Trump's), etc, etc."
You have expanded my horizons... .
 

wiscoaster

Well-known member
I will cut to the main point: "the adjusted odds ...
No, I'll cut to the real point: any time a statistical data reference is referred to as "adjusted" could mean that whatever data accumulated that didn't fit the desired or expected statistical result has been edited out. I tend to look askance at anything that's been "adjusted".
 

roscoe

Well-known member
No, I'll cut to the real point: any time a statistical data reference is referred to as "adjusted" could mean that whatever data accumulated that didn't fit the desired or expected statistical result has been edited out. I tend to look askance at anything that's been "adjusted".
The data are all there . . .
 

wiscoaster

Well-known member
The data are all there . . .
Yup, all there, just been twisted - err... "adjusted" - a little.:p

"Dr. Data, do I add these two numbers or do I multiply them?"
"No, Addled Intern, you divide them, then take the logarithm."
"Logarithm, Dr. Data?? Is that a band?"
 

doubleh

Member
Ho hum, nothing to see here except more liberal twisting of "data". I will keep doing what I have been doing and everyone else is welcome to the same. Whatever works for you is OK in my book.
 
One account of data that I have first hand experience with:

July 26th, 6 coworkers plus myself worked together on a project. One coworker was feeling bad that day. Bad enough to leave early.

Over the next five days 4 out of 7 of us had covid.

Me and another guy are unvaccinated. We never got sick. One other coworker never got sick, he was vaccinated.

Every coworker that caught it were vaccinated and boosted.

All 7 of us have had covid in the past.
 
Top